A survey of entomopathogenic nematode species in continental Portugal
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal of Helminthology
Abstract
Entomopathogenic nematodes (EPN) are lethal parasites of insects, used as
biocontrol agents. The objectives of thisworkwere to survey the presence of EPNin
continental Portugal and to characterize the different species. Of the 791 soil
samples collected throughout continental Portugal, 53 were positive for EPN.
Steinernema feltiae and Heterorhabditis bacteriophora were the two most abundant
species. Analysis of EPN geographical distribution revealed an association
between nematode species and vegetation type. Heterorhabditis bacteriophora was
mostly found in the Alentejo region while S. feltiae was present in land occupied by
agriculture with natural vegetation, broadleaved forest, mixed forest and
transitional woodland-shrub, agro-forestry areas, complex cultivated patterns
and non-irrigated arable land. Although no clear association was found between
species and soil type, S. feltiae was typically recovered from cambisols and
H. bacteriophora was more abundant in lithosols. Sequencing of the internal
transcribed spacer (ITS) region indicated that S. feltiae was the most abundant
species, followed by H. bacteriophora. Steinernema intermedium and S. kraussei were
each isolated from one site and Steinernema sp. from two sites. Phylogenetic
analyses of ITS, D2D3 expansion region of the 28S rRNA gene, as well as
mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COXI) and cytochrome b (cytb)
genes, was performed to evaluate the genetic diversity of S. feltiae and
H. bacteriophora. No significant genetic diversity was found among H. bacteriophora
isolates. However, COXI seems to be the best marker to study genetic diversity of
S. feltiae. This survey contributes to the understanding of EPN distribution in Europe.
Description
Citation
Valadas, V., Laranjo, M., Mota, M., Oliveira, S. (2014) “A survey of entomopathogenic nematode species in continental Portugal” Journal of Helminthology 88, 327–341