Barn owl feathers as biomonitors of mercury: sources of variation

dc.contributor.authorRoque, Inês
dc.contributor.authorLourenço, Rui
dc.contributor.authorMarques, Ana
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, João P.
dc.contributor.authorCoelho, Cláudia
dc.contributor.authorPereira, Eduarda
dc.contributor.authorRabaça, João E.
dc.contributor.authorRoulin, Alexandre
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-23T16:36:23Z
dc.date.available2017-01-23T16:36:23Z
dc.date.issued2016
dc.description.abstractGiven their central role in mercury (Hg) excretion and suitability as reservoirs, bird feathers are useful Hg biomonitors. Nevertheless, the interpretation of Hg concentrations is still questioned as a result of a poor knowledge of feather physiology and mechanisms affecting Hg deposition. Given the constraints of feather availability to ecotoxicological studies, we tested the effect of intraindividual differences in Hg concentrations according to feather type (body vs. flight feathers), position in the wing and size (mass and length) in order to understand how these factors could affect Hg estimates. We measured Hg concentration of 154 feathers from 28 un-moulted barn owls (Tyto alba), collected dead on roadsides. Median Hg concentration was 0.45 (0.076–4.5) mg kg-1 in body feathers, 0.44 (0.040–4.9) mg kg-1 in primary and 0.60 (0.042–4.7) mg kg-1 in secondary feathers, and we found a poor effect of feather type on intra-individual Hg levels. We also found a negative effect of wing feather mass on Hg concentration but not of feather length and of its position in the wing. We hypothesize that differences in feather growth rate may be the main driver of between-feather differences in Hg concentrations, which can have implications in the interpretation of Hg concentrations in feathers. Finally, we recommend that, whenever possible, several feathers from the same individual should be analysed. The five innermost primaries have lowest mean deviations to both betweenfeather and intra-individual mean Hg concentration and thus should be selected under restrictive sampling scenarios.por
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia. Companhia das Lezírias S.A.por
dc.identifier.authoremailiroque@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.authoremaillourenco@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailjrabaca@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.citationRoque, I. et al. 2016. Barn owl feathers as biomonitors of mercury: sources of variation in sampling procedures. Ecotoxicology,por
dc.identifier.doiDOI 10.1007/s10646-015-1604-8por
dc.identifier.revistaEcotoxicology
dc.identifier.scientificarea221por
dc.identifier.sharewithICAAMpor
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/19966
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherSpringerpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectBiomonitorpor
dc.subjectBarn Owlpor
dc.subjectMercurypor
dc.subjectPers''por
dc.titleBarn owl feathers as biomonitors of mercury: sources of variationpor
dc.typearticlepor

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
2016 Ecotoxicology 25-469-480.pdf
Size:
516.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: