Practical work in science education: a systematic literature review

dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Hugo
dc.contributor.authorBonito, Jorge
dc.contributor.editorBuckley, Jeffrey
dc.date.accessioned2023-05-30T09:56:37Z
dc.date.available2023-05-30T09:56:37Z
dc.date.issued2023-05
dc.description.abstractPractical work has taken a leading role in science teaching, particularly since the 1960s. Its goals are mainly oriented toward the development of sensitivity and taste for the study of physical and natural phenomena, bringing students closer to the daily reality experienced by researchers working in these areas of knowledge, while promoting educational success. However, these purposes have not always been achieved so, over time, limitations to the way that practical work has been developed have also been identified. In order to recognize the current state of the art on the development of the practical work in the teaching of sciences, a systematic literature review was designed, especially focused on the definition of the concept of practical work, its advantages, evaluation methodologies, and the criticism/limitations attributed to its implementation. To this end, four databases and one aggregator were used, to identify 53 international scientific publications. Analysis of this corpus allowed the identification of 8 categories associated to the concept of practical work, 5 categories associated to its advantages, 6 categories with the types/methodologies of evaluation and 5 categories associated with the limitations of this methodology. (From this analysis) it is concluded that most authors considers that the main idea integrative idea of the concept of practical work should be the manipulation of materials in practical activities (hands-on style), and the main advantage of this methodology comes from the fusion between the development of practical skills and the conceptual understanding (minds-on). In the evaluation methods, the context, procedures and specific instruments are favored and the main limitation pointed to this methodology is that the way practical work is implemented, is often not in agreement with the methods and techniques used by scientists and researchers.por
dc.identifier.authoremailhmjo@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.authoremailjbonito@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.citationOliveira, H., & Bonito, J. (2023). Practical work in science education: A systematic literature review. Frontiers in Education, 8, 1151641. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641por
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641por
dc.identifier.issn2504-284X
dc.identifier.numrev1151641
dc.identifier.pagina20
dc.identifier.principalpublicationtitlePractical work in science education: A systematic literature review
dc.identifier.revistaFrontiers in Education
dc.identifier.scientificarea229por
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/feduc.2023.1151641/full?utm_source=F-NTF&utm_medium=EMLX&utm_campaign=PRD_FEOPS_20170000_ARTICLE
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/35219
dc.identifier.volume8
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherFrontiers in Educationpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectscience educationpor
dc.subjectpractical work conceptpor
dc.subjectpractical work advantagespor
dc.subjectpractical work assessmentpor
dc.subjectpractical work disadvantagespor
dc.subjectsystematic reviewpor
dc.titlePractical work in science education: a systematic literature reviewpor
dc.typearticlepor
degois.publication.firstPage1por
degois.publication.lastPage20por
degois.publication.titleFrontiers in Educationpor
degois.publication.volume8por

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
feduc-08-1151641 (1).pdf
Size:
972.63 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: