Identification of tissue‐specific tumor biomarker using different optimization algorithms

dc.contributor.authorBhowmick, Shib Sankar
dc.contributor.authorBhattacharjee, Debotosh
dc.contributor.authorRato, Luis
dc.contributor.editorCho, Y.S.
dc.contributor.editorChung, Y.D.
dc.date.accessioned2019-03-01T10:59:06Z
dc.date.available2019-03-01T10:59:06Z
dc.date.embargo2019-06
dc.date.issued2018-12
dc.description.abstractBackground Identification of differentially expressed genes, i.e., genes whose transcript abundance level differs across different biological or physiological conditions, was indeed a challenging task. However, the inception of transcriptome sequencing (RNA-seq) technology revolutionized the simultaneous measurement of the transcript abundance levels for thousands of genes. Objective In this paper, such next-generation sequencing (NGS) data is used to identify biomarker signatures for several of the most common cancer types (bladder, colon, kidney, brain, liver, lung, prostate, skin, and thyroid) Methods Here, the problem is mapped into the comparison of optimization algorithms for selecting a set of genes that lead to the highest classification accuracy of a two-class classification task between healthy and tumor samples. As the opti- mization algorithms Artificial Bee Colony (ABC), Ant Colony Optimization, Differential Evolution, and Particle Swarm Optimization are chosen for this experiment. A standard statistical method called DESeq2 is used to select differentially expressed genes before being feed to the optimization algorithms. Classification of healthy and tumor samples is done by support vector machine Results Cancer-specific validation yields remarkably good results in terms of accuracy. Highest classification accuracy is achieved by the ABC algorithm for Brain lower grade glioma data is 99.10%. This validation is well supported by a statisti- cal test, gene ontology enrichment analysis, and KEGG pathway enrichment analysis for each cancer biomarker signature Conclusion The current study identified robust genes as biomarker signatures and these identified biomarkers might be helpful to accurately identify tumors of unknown originpor
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremaillmr@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.citationBhowmick, S.S., Bhattacharjee, D. & Rato, L., Identification of tissue‐specific tumor biomarker using different optimization algorithms, Genes and Genomics, The Genetics Society of Korea, Springer, 2018.por
dc.identifier.doihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0773-2por
dc.identifier.scientificarea498por
dc.identifier.urihttps://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-018-0773-2
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/25325
dc.language.isoporpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherSpringerpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectbiomarkerpor
dc.subjectmachine learningpor
dc.subjectmessenger RNApor
dc.subjectoptimizationpor
dc.subjectpathway analysispor
dc.titleIdentification of tissue‐specific tumor biomarker using different optimization algorithmspor
dc.typearticlepor

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
DSPACE_Q4_2018_ou_2019_genes-korea_shib_10.1007_s13258-018-0773-2.pdf
Size:
1.36 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: