Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises

dc.contributor.authorPezarat-Correia, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorMedeiros, Pedro
dc.contributor.authorFernandes, Orlando
dc.contributor.authorVaz, João
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Luís
dc.contributor.authorMoraes, António
dc.date.accessioned2023-02-13T17:35:26Z
dc.date.available2023-02-13T17:35:26Z
dc.date.issued2020-03
dc.description.abstractObjective: To quantify and compare the electromyographic activity of 10 muscles in three pullover exercises. Methods: 15 healthy men, with at least two years of experience in resistance training, executed in random order six repetitions with 60% of 1 Maximum Repetition for three different pullover exercises: lying on a step with a barbell, grip 100% biacromial (E1); lying on a step with a barbell, grip 150% (E2); lying on a Swiss ball with a barbell, grip 100% (E3). Surface electromyography was recorded from the Deltoideus (Clavicular and Spinalis Pars), Pectoralis Major (Clavicular and Sternocostalis Pars), Serratus Anterior, Triceps Brachii (Long Head), Latissimus Dorsi, Infraspinatus, Rectus Abdominis, Obliquus Internus Abdominis and Transversus Abdominis. The normalized Maximum Repetition electromyographyc of each muscle was calculated for each exercise. Results: The most engaged muscles were Infraspinatus (51-53%) and Posterior Deltoid (49-51%). Surface electromyography activity was similar between the E1, E2 and E3 exercises. Conclusions: This study quantified muscular solicitation during pullover exercises performed with 60% Maximum Repetition. The muscles with higher level of activation were the Posterior Deltoid and the Infraspinatus, suggesting that pullover may be a valid option for strengthening the dynamic stabilizing muscles of shoulder joint in trained individuals. No significant differences in muscle electromyography intensity were observed when grip distance and trunk stabilization were altered, showing that these conditions do not influence muscle activation levels. However, the 1 Maximum Repetition was lower when the pullover was performed on a Swiss ball, suggesting that it is possible to obtain higher level of muscle recruitment with lower weights in unstable exercises.por
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailorlandoj@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.doi10.33155/j.ramd.2020.03.004por
dc.identifier.pagina127-133
dc.identifier.revistaRevista Andaluza de Medicina del Deporte
dc.identifier.scientificarea251por
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.researchgate.net/publication/365578638_Comparison_of_shoulder_and_trunk_muscle_activation_between_different_pullover_exercises
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/34270
dc.identifier.volume13(3)
dc.language.isoporpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherRevista Andaluza de Medicina del Deportepor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjecttrunk musclepor
dc.subjectshoulder musclespor
dc.subjectmuscle activationpor
dc.subjectEMGpor
dc.subjectpullover exercisespor
dc.titleComparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercisespor
dc.typearticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Comparison of shoulder and trunk muscle activation between different pullover exercises.pdf
Size:
46.04 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: