Comparative proteomic analysis of saliva from dogs with and without obesity-related metabolic dysfuntion
Loading...
Date
Journal Title
Journal ISSN
Volume Title
Publisher
Journal of Proteomics
Abstract
Dogs develop only some of the components of the human metabolic syndrome (MetS). Thus, in order to study
possible MetS-related alterations in dogs, human MetS criteria were adapted to define canine MetS or so-called
obesity-related metabolic dysfunction (ORMD). The main objective of this study was to identify changes in the
salivary proteome of obese dogs with ORMD in comparison with obese dogs without ORMD which may constitute
potential salivary biomarkers for assessing ORMD. In a first phase, 12 adult obese dogs with ORMD
(N=6) and without ORMD (N=6) were included in the study. Subsequently, and with the aim of validating
and strengthening the results, additional 12 obese dogs (6 with and 6 without ORMD) were tested in an independent
experiment following the same protocol. Saliva samples were subjected to a quantitative proteomics
analysis and the levels of nine salivary proteins were found to be significantly different between groups, among
them those which had greatest fold-change were proteins involved in glycolysis and oxidative stress. In conclusion,
despite metabolic syndrome to include different combinations of diseases, the observation of differences
in salivary proteome suggests a potential of this fluid to understand the pathophysiology of the disease.
Significance: This is the first study evaluating proteomes of saliva in dogs, as a non invasive sample, in order to
increase knowledge about the metabolic/physiopathological changes related to obesity-related metabolic dysfunction
(ORMD) together with the identification of potential biomarkers for its diagnosis. As approximately
20% of dogs with naturally occurring obesity were described to suffer ORMD associated with insulin resistance
and hypoadiponectinemia, the fact that indicate possible links between ORMD and associated diseases.
Description
Keywords
Citation
Journal of Proteomics 201 (2019) 65–72