Distributed Knowledge Bases: a Proposal for Argumentation-based Semantics with Cooperation

dc.contributor.authorCarnevale de Almeida, Iara
dc.date.accessioned2011-03-10T11:57:59Z
dc.date.available2011-03-10T11:57:59Z
dc.date.issued2011-01
dc.description.abstractThe main objective of this dissertation is to define an argumentation-based negotiation framework for distributed knowledge bases. Knowledge bases are modeling over a multi-agent setting (MAS) such that each agent possibly has an independent or overlapping knowledge base. This dissertation proposes that agents evaluate arguments to obtain a consensus about a common knowledge by both proposing arguments or trying to build opposing arguments against them. Moreover, this proposal deals with incomplete knowledge (i.e. partial arguments) and so a cooperation process grants arguments to achieve knowledge completeness. Therefore, a negotiation of an agent's belief is seen as an argumentation-based process with cooperation; both cooperation and argumentation are seen as interlaced processes. Furthermore, each agent Ag has both set Argue of argumentative agents and set Cooperate of cooperative agents; every agent Ag must reach a consensus on its arguments with agents in Argue, and Ag may ask for arguments from agents in Cooperate to complete its partial arguments. The argumentation-based negotiation proposal allows the modeling a hierarchy of knowledge bases representing, for instance, a business's organization or a taxonomy of some subject, and also an MAS where each agent represents "acquired knowledge" in a different period of time. Furthermore, any agent in a MAS can be queried regarding the truth value of some belief. It depends on from which agent such a belief is inferred, and also what the specification in both Argue and Cooperate is, given the overall agents in the MAS. However, such an answer will always be consistent/paraconsistent with agents' knowledge base involved. This dissertation proposes a (declarative and operational) argumentation semantics for an agent's knowledge base. Furthermore, it proposes a declarative argumentation-based negotiation semantics for a multi-agent setting, which uses most of the definitions from the former semantics.en
dc.format.extent1178170 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.identifier.accesstypelivreen
dc.identifier.authoremailica@di.uevora.pt
dc.identifier.numpag194 pagen
dc.identifier.orientadorAlferes, José Júlio
dc.identifier.orientadorArriaga da Cunha, Luis
dc.identifier.scientificarea283en
dc.identifier.tipoTeseDoutoramentoen
dc.identifier.universidadeUniversidade de Évoraen
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/2599
dc.language.isoeng
dc.rightsopenAccessen
dc.subjectArtificial Intelligenceen
dc.subjectKnowledge Representationen
dc.subjectLogic Programmingen
dc.subjectConsistent and Paraconsistenten
dc.subjectIncomplete Knowledgeen
dc.subjectCooperationen
dc.subjectNegotiation based-argumentation semanticsen
dc.titleDistributed Knowledge Bases: a Proposal for Argumentation-based Semantics with Cooperationen
dc.typedoctoralThesisen

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
PhDthesis-IaraCarnevaleAlmeidaJaneiro2011.pdf
Size:
1.12 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description:
Documento principal

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.71 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: