Effect of weekly Plyometric training frequency on Adolescents female basketball players during in-season: A comparison of two vs. four sessions

dc.contributor.authorFigueira, Bruno
dc.contributor.authorAbade, Eduardo
dc.contributor.authorMateus, Nuno
dc.contributor.authorWeldon, Anthony
dc.contributor.authorSampaio, Jaime
dc.contributor.authorPaulauskas, Rutenis
dc.date.accessioned2025-07-22T10:38:20Z
dc.date.available2025-07-22T10:38:20Z
dc.date.issued2025-04
dc.description.abstractThis study investigated the effects lower vs. higher frequencies of volume-equated plyometric training youth female basketball players. Thirty youth highly trained female basketball players (age, 15.7 ± 0.5 years; body mass, 64.1 ± 8.6 kg; height, 172.8 ± 6.2 cm, basketball training experience 6.3 ± 1.7 years) integrating a youth national development program participated in the study. A parallel-group randomized trial was undertaken to assess the effect of an eight-week plyometric intervention on jumping (counter-movement jump, drop-jump, horizontal jump), running (5 and 20-meter sprint), and change of direction performance. The study compared the outcomes of two versus four volume-equated training sessions per week, followed by a one-week retention period. A Bayesian Mixed Factor ANOVA revealed decisive evidence that the change of direction improved performance between the pre-test and post-test, as well as pre-test and retention. No discernible differences emerged between intervention groups. For the counter-movement jump, moderate evidence supported performance improvements in the 2PLYO group. In drop jump, both groups demonstrated decisive improvements between the pre-test and post-test, with moderate evidence for pre-test and retention, but no group differences were observed. These findings suggest that an 8-week plyometric training program, in both frequencies, leads to significant improvements in change-of-direction, countermovement jump, and drop jump performance among female junior basketball players participating in a youth national development program. However, it remains inconclusive whether a two-day training frequency provides a distinct advantage over four-days. Further research or consideration of additional factors may be necessary to ascertain the optimal training frequency for maximizing benefits.por
dc.identifier.authoremailbruno.figueira@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.citationFigueira, B., Abade, E., Mateus, N., Weldon, A., Sampaio, J., & Paulauskas, R. (2025). Effect of weekly Plyometric training frequency on Adolescents female basketball players during in-season: A comparison of two vs. four sessions. PloS one, 20(4), e0320195. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0320195por
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0320195por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/39037
dc.language.isoporpor
dc.peerreviewednopor
dc.publisherPlos Onepor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.titleEffect of weekly Plyometric training frequency on Adolescents female basketball players during in-season: A comparison of two vs. four sessionspor
dc.typearticle

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
journal.pone.0320195.pdf
Size:
754.12 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: