Are study trips a leisure time for students and teachers?

dc.contributor.authorFreire, Maria
dc.contributor.editorDymitryszyn, I.
dc.contributor.editorKaczynska, M.
dc.contributor.editorMaksymiuk, G.
dc.date.accessioned2013-01-17T14:51:31Z
dc.date.available2013-01-17T14:51:31Z
dc.date.issued2012-09-19
dc.description.abstractFew curricular programmes recognize officially the study trips and only occasionally some schools make efforts to realize some particular ones. Even so, they aren’t considered as a basic educational strategy, fundamental to seduce students about the landscape architecture and to explore the power of the landscape. The study trips can no more be seen as leisure time for students and teachers. As real opportunity of experiment the space - the object of work of the landscape architect - they are a basilar educational strategy in landscape architecture. The study trips are fundamental for students become familiar with the landscape, comprehend it, reflect about and be critical (as students and as future professionals). More than that, they are the opportunity to include and make in evidence a wide range of specific issues concerning landscape (humanistic, artistic and scientific principles, together with a comprehensive and inclusive view), at the same time, they introduce the students in the diversity and the complexity of processes, domains and actors involved in the landscape transformation. For all reasons it is fundamental ‘to put students in the landscape’. So, study trips should be created in all curricular programmes, establishing the connection between academic, curricular and disciplinary issues. This educational strategy has to be accompanied with others (group reflection, graphic diaries, meta-cognitive scripts, portfolios, documentaries, and reports, between others). Only this way we can expect students to learn ‘how to see’, ‘how to do’ and ‘how to be’ - ideas conceptually engaged in the process of landscape architecture.por
dc.identifier.authoremailmcmf@uevora.pt
dc.identifier.citationFreire, M. (2012). Are study trips a leisure time for students and teachers? In I. Dymitryszyn, M. Kaczynska & G. Maksymiuk (Eds.). Peer Reviewed Proceedings of ECLAS 2012 Conference ‘The power of landscape’, University of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Poland, 19-22 September, 2012, pp. 474-477. ISBN 978-83-935884-0-4.por
dc.identifier.isbn978-83-935884-0-4
dc.identifier.paginapp. 474-477
dc.identifier.principalpublicationtitlePeer Reviewed Proceedings of ECLAS 2012 Conference ‘The power of landscape’
dc.identifier.scientificarea672por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/7393
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.publisherUniversity of Life Sciences - SGGWpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectlandscape architecturepor
dc.subjecteducational strategypor
dc.subjectstudy tripspor
dc.subjectlandscape experiencepor
dc.subjectcurricular programmespor
dc.titleAre study trips a leisure time for students and teachers?por
dc.typearticlepor
degois.publication.firstPageAre study trips a leisure time for students and teachers? Landscape architecture, educational strategy, study trips, landscape experience, curricular programmes Abstract Few curricular programmes recognize officially the study trips and only occasionally some schools make efforts to realize some particular ones. Even so, they aren’t considered as a basic educational strategy, fundamental to seduce students about the landscape architecture and to explore the power of the landscape. The study trips can no more be seen as leisure time for students and teachers. As real opportunity of experiment the space - the object of work of the landscape architect - they are a basilar educational strategy in landscape architecture. The study trips are fundamental for students become familiar with the landscape, comprehend it, reflect about and be critical (as students and as future professionals). More than that, they are the opportunity to include and make in evidence a wide range of specific issues concerning landscape (humanistic, artistic and scientific principles, together with a comprehensive and inclusive view), at the same time, they introduce the students in the diversity and the complexity of processes, domains and actors involved in the landscape transformation. For all reasons it is fundamental ‘to put students in the landscape’. So, study trips should be created in all curricular programmes, establishing the connection between academic, curricular and disciplinary issues. This educational strategy has to be accompanied with others (group reflection, graphic diaries, meta-cognitive scripts, portfolios, documentaries, and reports, between others). Only this way we can expect students to learn ‘how to see’, ‘how to do’ and ‘how to be’ - ideas conceptually engaged in the process of landscape architecture. Introduction Landscape architecture education is characterized by a strong inter-dependence and articulation of knowledge and practices - an intricate educational process, explained by landscape complexity and by landscape architect role. These conditions determine different teaching strategies, translated into multiple activities, opportunities and situations to confront the student (Freire, 2011). As supported by Peter Rowe (2002) the construction of this complex knowledge and learning are not limited to the traditional studio. On the contrary, several strategies play a central role in the teaching of landscape architecture - study trips, internships, multiplicity of researches and practices, group discussion. This is possible to confirm in the most part of curricula and teaching strategies applied in several landscape architecture schools of Europe and America. All those strategies are fundamental to the acquisition of knowledge, experience and critical reflection - which enrich the visual, cultural, theoretical and practical repertoire of students - a result of inclusive and humanistic dimension, intrinsic to landscape architecture (Freire, 2011). In the universe of the most notice European and North American schools of landscape architecture, its possible to confirm the mentioned complexity of teaching and learning, which includes various classes with field studies and also tours, named as study trips. The first ones are short visits, fundamental to support some practical exercises or particular issues. Not so often, it’s possible to observe some integratedpor
degois.publication.lastPageAt present, we are trying to strength the study trips with others educational strategies - daily graphics, portfolios, posters, reports and documentaries. All of them accomplish with some particular frameworks: meta-cognitive script, provided in advance, very structured and detailed (what do I see? What it feels like? What I read? What is the singularity of the site? How can I record the evidence and justify such selection? what did I learn? It serves for what? How was my performance? How affect it?...); discussion sessions between students and with teachers; and a planned observation from different perspectives (aesthetic, ecological and cultural) and their combination, using a variety of instruments (video, travel diaries, drawing and diagrammed sketch, photographs, between others). Conclusions Despite such educational importance and some tradition linked with study trips courses of landscape architecture, few curricular programmes recognize officially the study trips and mostly occasionally some schools make efforts to realize some particular ones. In the most part of the European schools they aren’t part of school dynamic neither considered as a basic education strategy. In general ‘to put students in the landscape’ it is not considered a basic education strategy, crucial to seduce the students about the landscape architecture or as a mean to explore the power of the landscape. As we defend this opportunity is a vital part in the education of landscape architecture. Hence we must fight against the idea of mere leisure time (for students and teachers), often verbalized, and make the incorporation of the field trips and study trips in the curricular programmes as a way to strength it. They are the real experience of the landscape, as so an incomparable strategy able to make the connection between academic, curricular and disciplinary issues. Although this educational strategy has to be accompanied with others: group reflection (between students and with teachers), graphic diaries, portfolios, documentaries, and reports, between others. Only that way we can expect that students learn ‘how to see’, ‘how to do’ and ‘how to be’ - ideas conceptually engaged in the process of landscape architecture. REFERENCES Freire, M. (2009). ‘Landscape design - theory in landscape architecture. Teaching experiments in the University of Évora’, in Proceedings of ECLAS Conference, Landscape ruins, Genoa, Italy, 152-155. Freire, M. (2011). Towards a different approach in teaching landscape design. Doctoral thesis, University of Évora, Portugal. Merleau-Ponty, M. (1999). Phenomenology of perception (2a Ed.). (C. Moura, Trad.). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes. Rowe, P. (2002). Professional design education and practice, in A. Salama, W. O’Reilly, & K. Noschis (Eds.). Architectural education today. Cross-cultural perspectives. Lausanne: Comportments and authors.por
degois.publication.locationUniversity of Life Sciences - SGGW, Warsaw, Polandpor
degois.publication.titlePeer Reviewed Proceedings of ECLAS 2012 Conference ‘The power of landscape’por

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
Are study trips a leisure time for students and teachers_.pdf
Size:
2.73 MB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: