Ecological and epidemiological models are both useful for SARS-CoV-2
| dc.contributor.author | Araújo, Miguel | |
| dc.contributor.author | Mestre, Frederico | |
| dc.contributor.author | Naimi, Babak | |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2022-05-03T14:11:12Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2022-05-03T14:11:12Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2020-06-23 | |
| dc.description.abstract | A longstanding debate exists on whether ecological phenomena should be modelled ‘top-down’ (modelling patterns that arise from mechanisms) or ‘bottom-up’ (modelling mechanisms to generate pattern). Recently, the discussion re-emerged in the context of modelling the spread of SARS-CoV-21. Simply put, the point made by Carlson et al. was that top-down correlative models are inappropriate, whereas bottom-up epidemiological models are fine. Rather than opposing families of models, we argue that all have strengths and limitations and that judicious use of all available tools is the way forward. | por |
| dc.identifier.authoremail | mba@uevora.pt | |
| dc.identifier.authoremail | fmestre@uevora.pt | |
| dc.identifier.authoremail | naimi.b@gmail.com | |
| dc.identifier.citation | Araújo, M. B., Mestre, F., & Naimi, B. (2020). Ecological and epidemiological models are both useful for SARS-CoV-2. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(9), 1153-1154. | por |
| dc.identifier.doi | 10.1038/s41559-020-1246-y | por |
| dc.identifier.scientificarea | 223 | por |
| dc.identifier.uri | https://www.nature.com/articles/s41559-020-1246-y | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10174/31971 | |
| dc.language.iso | por | por |
| dc.peerreviewed | yes | por |
| dc.publisher | Nature Ecology & Evolution | por |
| dc.rights | openAccess | por |
| dc.title | Ecological and epidemiological models are both useful for SARS-CoV-2 | por |
| dc.type | article | por |