Airborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1

dc.contributor.authorGalán C.
dc.contributor.authorAntunes, C.M.
dc.contributor.authorBrandao, R. M.
dc.contributor.authorTorres, C.
dc.contributor.authorGarcia-Mozo, H.
dc.contributor.authorCaeiro, E.
dc.contributor.authorR. Ferro
dc.contributor.authorPrank, M.
dc.contributor.authorSofiev, M.
dc.contributor.authorR. Albertini
dc.contributor.authorU. Berger
dc.contributor.authorL. Cecchi
dc.contributor.authorCelenk, Sevcan
dc.contributor.authorGrewling L.
dc.contributor.authorJackowiak, B.
dc.contributor.authorJäger, S.
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Roy
dc.contributor.authorA. Rantio-Lehtimäki
dc.contributor.authorG.Reese
dc.contributor.authorI. Sauliene
dc.contributor.authorSmith, M.
dc.contributor.authorThibaudon, M.
dc.contributor.authorWeber, B.
dc.contributor.authorWeichenmeier, I.
dc.contributor.authorPusch, G.
dc.contributor.authorButers J.
dc.date.accessioned2014-01-22T15:18:32Z
dc.date.available2014-01-22T15:18:32Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.date.updated2014-01-21T15:25:45Z
dc.description.abstractPollen is routinely monitored, but it is unknown whether pollen counts represent allergen exposure. We therefore simultaneously determined olive pollen and Ole e 1 in ambient air in C ordoba, Spain, and Evora, Portugal, using Hirst-type traps for pollen and high-volume cascade impactors for allergen. Pollen from different days released 12-fold different amounts of Ole e 1 per pollen (both locations P < 0.001). Average allergen release from pollen (pollen potency) was much higher in C ordoba (3.9 pg Ole e 1/pollen) than in Evora (0.8 pg Ole e 1/pollen, P = 0.004). Indeed, yearly olive pollen counts in C ordoba were 2.4 times higher than in Evora, but Ole e 1 concentrations were 7.6 times higher. When modeling the origin of the pollen, >40% of Ole e 1 exposure in Evora was explained by high-potency pollen originating from the south of Spain. Thus, olive pollen can vary substantially in allergen release, even though they are morphologically identical.por
dc.identifier01054538en_US
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.authoremailnd
dc.identifier.citationGalán C.; Antunes, C.M.; Brandao, R. M.; Torres, C.; Garcia-Mozo, H.; Caeiro, E.; R. Ferro; Prank, M.; Sofiev, M.; R. Albertini; U. Berger; L. Cecchi; Celenk, Sevcan; Grewling L.; Jackowiak, B.; Jäger, S.; Kennedy, Roy; A. Rantio-Lehtimäki; G.Reese; I. Sauliene; Smith, M.; Thibaudon, M.; Weber, B.; Weichenmeier, I.; Pusch, G.; Buters J.Airborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1, Allergy, 68, 6, 809-812, 2013.por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/9887
dc.language.isoporpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectoleapor
dc.subjectpollenpor
dc.subjectaeroallergenspor
dc.subjectHialine projectpor
dc.subjectOle epor
dc.subjectoutdoor environmentpor
dc.titleAirborne olive pollen counts are not representative of exposure to the major olive allergen Ole e 1por
dc.typearticlepor

Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
AllergyOlive2013.pdf
Size:
331.6 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format

License bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
license.txt
Size:
3.89 KB
Format:
Item-specific license agreed upon to submission
Description: